With some of the standard bearers in the filter market accounted for, we turned our sights to more niche options like the Tiffen 77HOSTR Hollywood, a star filter with an asymmetrical diffraction pattern scored into the glass that works wonders on in-frame light sources. The only place single-intensity ND does make sense is in rectangular graduated filters like you see with the Cokin Square Creative Kit, as these are most often used in static landscape work. That's why we added the exceptional Gobe ND2-400 Variable Neutral Density to our list, as well as the Canon Drop-In Variable ND. But in the digital world, variable NDs make more sense.
#Are vivitar lens filters quality iso#
If you were shooting celluloid, sure, as your ISO (ASA) would be locked to your roll unless you wanted to push or pull it in development, so consistency in your ND could help you be more precise. This may be a personal preference, but given the flexibility of DSLRs and mirrorless cameras today, it doesn't make any sense to me to have a single-intensity ND. Our few neutral density offerings also saw some changes, as a Tiffen model, as well as a nice offering from Breakthrough Photography, both exited the list.
You could tell that's what it was because the reflections were inverted, which is how images appear in convex front elements. You can get higher quality, but these are fine for many users and the price sure is right.
#Are vivitar lens filters quality series#
That Amazon model in particular had a huge reflection problem from light bouncing off the front element of the lens and hitting the backside of the filter. Vivitar Series 1 lenses were a game changer for 3rd party lens manufacturers, with features and quality rivalling, sometimes surpassing OEM lenses. That kit stayed, because it offers a lot of high quality glass for a pretty reasonable price, but the Tiffen and Amazonbasics models were sent packing. For example, we had four different UV filters previously, as well as the Hoya Digital Kit II, which comes with one of its own. I admit that the only other prime lens I have ever used in this range was an old M42 Pentacon 29mm f/2.8, which was mindboggling awful.For this iteration of our ranking, we wanted to go back in and make sure there weren't any redundancies that couldn't be justified by significant differences in the offerings. Overall I felt that distortion was not objectionable, and I did not notice any colour aberrations, but I have not taken many photographs with the lens in an environment that would produce them. My subjective impression is that at f/2.8 it is still sharp in the middle, but the outer corners as above become a kind of blur, and the contrast goes to pot. I suspect on a cropped digital body it would be a decent 50mm substitute at f/4 and f/5.6. I paid an absolute pittance, less than £20. Here's a shot taken further up the hill, in direct sunlight, cropped from roughly one-eight of the image width in from the edge, also at f/8:
Unfortunately that image is useless for showing you how the lens performs at the edge.
Here's a full-sized crop of the houses in the middle: Here's an example I shot an hour or so ago with a full-frame body at f/8 and turned into black and white, using Photoshop's default level of 25 for sharpening: My subjective opinion is that, at f/8, it is sharp in the middle and remains good until the very edge, at which point it becomes blurry and soft, but not offensively so. I wanted something smaller and easier to carry around than a large zoom lens. I have mounted it on a full-frame Canon body with an adapter. It was in the Contax/Yashica mount, with RMC Tokina 28mm 1:2.8 81104486 written around the edge. The best I've owned is the Olympus Zuiko 28mm f2.8 and the best I've ever seen are the Leica 28mm Elmarit-M and Minolta 28mm Rokkor-M, both made for Leica Rangefinder mounts, with shorter back focus (the 25mm Voitlander Skopar is similar in that regard)Īncient thread, but I recently bought one of these lenses, and this was the first thing that Google gave me. modern enough) mount, the Vivitar 28mm f2.5 shows up on ebay alot and usually sells for $25-40 and it's a screaming bargain at that price).īTW, 28mm is my favorite focal length by far, so I have experience with tons of 28mm lenses. The review describes the build quality and handling and shows how the lens performs in terms of sharpness, bokeh, distortion, flare, and CA. (All of these lenses were actually made by Kiron, who made most Vivitar lenses of that era). This is a real world review of the Vivitar 55 f2.8 Auto Macro adapted to Sony E-mount - Sony A7s and a6500. The only other 3rd Party 28mm lenses that I've had that are comparable in quality are an Old, bulky Vivitar 28mm f2.5, and a Kiron 28mm f2, and similar Vivitar Series 1 f1.9. It's not quite as sharp as my Zuiko 28mm f2.8, or my 25mm f4 Voigtlander Skopar, but it's in the same class as the Nikon, Canon, and Minolta OEM 28mm lenses that I've used (not counting exotic aspherical lenses). I'd say that the Tokina is pretty good for a 3rd party lens.
0 kommentar(er)
